OUR CLIENT has a properly registered
security interest lodged on the PPSR in respect of a Retention of Title clause
included in their terms & conditions with THEIR BUYER.
Because OUR CLIENT’S security interest is
in the form of a Retention of Title clause it entitles OUR CLIENT to have
designated their security interest as a Purchase Money Security Interest (PMSI)
thus giving OUR CLIENT a higher level of priority for their security than might
otherwise be the case.
OUR CLIENT’S security interest also extends
to any proceeds that might arise from THEIR BUYER on-selling or otherwise
using/disposing of the goods subject to the retention of title.
However, as far as those proceeds are
concerned (just the proceeds, not the actual goods OUR CLIENT has supplied) THE
BUYER’S BANKERS are advising OUR CLIENT that they have a competing claim to the
proceeds by virtue of a debtor financing facility they have put in place with
THEIR BUYER. THE BUYER’S BANKERS are suggesting that, in the event of
THEIR BUYER entering into receivership or liquidation, their claim on the
proceeds will rank higher than OUR CLIENT’S claim. While this position
may be subject to challenge, Section 64 of the PPSA certainly gives them
grounds for this view. In
return for being pushed down the priority pecking order for proceeds, OUR
CLIENT will automatically have their PMSI rights expanded to include a share in
the money being advanced by THE BUYER’S BANKERS in so much as it relates to the
sale of product originating from OUR CLIENT.
While I’ve yet to see any examples of this
being challenged/upheld in practice, OUR CLIENT should proceed on the basis
that, while they have the highest priority security interest over the goods
they are specifically supplying, they probably now only have a second level
priority over any proceeds that may arise from the subsequent sale of
those goods by THEIR BUYER.
No action is required on OUR CLIENT’S
part.
On the one hand, the presence of THE
BUYER’S BANKERS’ debtor financing may give OUR CLIENT some additional comfort
that finance is being made available to THEIR BUYER to make payments to its
suppliers but on the other, if THEIR BUYER does fail, the extent to which their
security interest can be stretched to include income from goods OUR CLIENT
supplied but which have subsequently been sold by THEIR BUYER has been
weakened.
We have seen banks and other financiers try
to ‘encourage’ suppliers who have registered PMSI interests to discharge their
registrations or otherwise grant releases where the bank is looking to
securitise its book debt financing facilities but issuing such notices under
Section 64 of the PPSA is the correct way for banks to go about this and better
achieve their ends.
As per usual, I have reproduced below the actual text from Section 64 of the Act:
Non‑purchase money security interest in account as
original collateral has priority over purchase money security interest in
account as proceeds of inventory
(1) Despite subsection 62(2), a non‑purchase money
security interest (the priority interest) granted for new
value in an account as original collateral and perfected by registration has
priority over a perfected purchase money security interest that is granted by
the same grantor in the account as proceeds of inventory, if:
(a) the registration time in respect of the
priority interest occurs before the earlier of the following times:
(i) the time at which the purchase money security
interest is perfected;
(ii) the registration time in respect of the
purchase money security interest; or
(b) both of the following conditions are met:
(i) the secured party holding the priority
interest gives a notice in accordance with subsection (2) to the secured
party holding the purchase money security interest;
(ii) the notice is given at least 15 business days
before the earlier of the day on which the registration time for the account
occurs and the day the priority interest attaches to the account.
Note 1: This
section is subject to sections 57 (perfection by control) and 71 (chattel
paper).
Note 2: The period
mentioned in paragraph (b) may be extended by a court under
section 293.
(2) A notice is given in accordance with this
subsection if:
(a) the notice is in the approved form; or
(b) the notice:
(i) contains a description of the inventory to
which the notice relates; and
(ii) sets out the effect of subsection (1).
Perfected purchase money security interest in both
proceeds and new value
(3) If a person has a purchase money security
interest in an account as proceeds of inventory that is subordinate to a non‑purchase
money security interest under subsection (1):
(a) the person is taken to have a purchase money
security interest in both the proceeds of the inventory and in the new value
mentioned in subsection (1); and
(b) the purchase money security interest in the
new value is taken to be perfected by the registration that perfected the
purchase money security interest in the proceeds; and
(c) the new value is taken to be an account for
the purposes of this Act (except for the purposes of this section or
paragraph 12(3)(a) (account transferee’s interest taken to be security
interest)).
(4) However, if the new value mentioned in
paragraph (3)(c) would be an account for the purposes of this Act in the
absence of that paragraph, the paragraph does not prevent the new value from
being an account for the purposes of this section or paragraph 12(3)(a).
No comments:
Post a Comment