Under a Consignment Stock arrangement Company A supplies
goods to Company B without passing ownership until such time as those goods are
used or sold by Company B – at that point in time a payment obligation between
Company A and Company B is created. Any
unused/unsold goods will usually be returned to Company A.
The Personal Property Securities Act treats the structure of
Consignment Stock arrangements as providing a security interest for Company A
in the goods supplied (PPSA Sections 12(2)(h) and 12(3)(b) refer).
The PPSA goes on to allow for such a security interest to be
designated a Purchase Money Security Interest (PMSI) thus allowing Company A a
greater priority claim over the goods they supplied than, say, the holder of a general security
agreement over all the assets of Company B (PPSA Section 14(1)(d) refers).
So, as with Leasing arrangements and Retention of Title
clauses, it is not necessary for the terms of a Consignment Stock arrangement to
specifically describe the agreement as a form of security for it to
nevertheless be considered as such in the event of an administrator being attached
to Company B.
Unfortunately, this can be something of a double-edged
sword.
Whenever the PPSA provides for an arrangement/agreement to
be treated as a security interest it also allows for an administrator to
vest the goods/collateral in question along with the rest of the assets of the
debtor company UNLESS that security interest has been correctly registered on
the PPSR.
Bringing this home quite strikingly was the entry into
liquidation last month of Jacksons Rare Guitars Pty Ltd in Annandale, in Sydney’s
inner west. At the time a voluntary
administrator was first appointed, Jacksons had over 100 clients who were using
Jacksons to sell their instruments on a consignment basis representing almost
$850,000 of the total stock.
In a pre-PPSA world the individual consignors could have
relied upon consignment notes to prove ownership and claim back their
instruments but, since PPSA, if they failed to register their consignment on
the PPSR (and I’m not aware of any who did) their precious guitars would be
vested by the liquidator with the rest of Jacksons’ stock and sold off for the
benefit of, primarily, other creditors.
Unfortunately, it is the post-PPSA scenario that is currently playing
itself out in Annandale.
While we continue to bemoan the poor promotion the Federal
Government has engaged in regarding letting small and medium sized businesses
know about the implications and requirements of the PPSR let us spare a thought
for the lack of promotion towards the general public who may first become aware
of the Register at the same time as they’re being told that they can’t have
their guitar back!
No comments:
Post a Comment