A long-standing credit agreement is not enough to determine Transitional status

The 7^th March 2014 saw a little bit of clarity being brought to one of the PPSA’s notorious grey areas.  

The clarity came in the form of a judgment in the Supreme Court of Victoria and the grey area concerned the applicability of the PPSA’s transitional rules to Retention of Title clauses enshrined in long-standing Terms & Conditions.

The case concerned the May 2013 collapse of the cleaning company, Swan Services Pty Ltd and a claim by one of its creditors, Central Cleaning Supplies (Aust) Pty Ltd, that they should be able to rely on their Retention of Title clause to recover unpaid for equipment.

 

The liquidators argued that, since the introduction of the Personal Property Securities Act (PPSA), any goods subject to an ‘unperfected’ security interest would vest with them and, as Central Cleaning Supplies had not perfected their Retention of Title security interest on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR), the equipment they had supplied would be subject to the liquidators’ control.

Central Cleaning Supplies countered with reference to the PPSA’s Transitional Arrangements – a means by which security interests arising from long-standing agreements could be effectively ‘grandfathered’ into being ‘perfected’, without need for formal registration, for up to 2 years.  While the 2 year Transitional Period has now ended it was certainly applicable at the time Central Cleaning Services was challenging the liquidators for return of their equipment.

The case was put before Justice Ferguson to find the correct interpretation.

In her deliberations it was determined that, although Swan Services had entered into a credit agreement with Central Cleaning Services before the PPSA came into effect, the security represented by Central Cleaning Services’ Retention of Title clause was not actually incorporated into either the credit agreement or the standard terms & conditions embraced by that credit agreement.  Rather, the Retention of Title clause appeared in a Conditions of Sale document that formed part of individual invoices issued as and when deliveries were made.

Therefore, the initial credit agreement did not act as an overarching agreement out of which individual security interests were created (as would be necessary for the transitional arrangements to apply) but instead each invoice was held to create its own security agreement and security interest.  In order to perfect its Retention of Title clause, Central Cleaning Services could not, therefore rely on the PPSA’s transitional arrangements and should have registered their security on the PPSR as a non-transitional interest.

While it might often be convenient to refer to the date of a credit application in order to decide if subsequent dealings create transitional or non-transitional interests suppliers must not lose sight of the fact that it is the acceptance date of the actual document that imposes the security condition that will be the determining factor.

Where there is any doubt I would strongly recommend a non-transitional registration.

Central Cleaning Supplies (Aust) Pty Limited v Elkerton and Young as liquidators of Swan Services Pty Limited (in Liquidation) [2014] VSC 61